The possibility of being able to “switch off” or down regulate the operation of the Anthoceroate  CCM is not unrealistic in the light of recent work by Smith and  Griffiths (2000) who established that CA plays a role in the operation  of the CCM in Phaeoceros laevis ,  as in all microalage investigated.  Smith and Griffiths (2000)  conducted an investigation into the role of CA in photosynthesis and the  activity of the CCM in Anthocerotae by using the membrane-permeable CA inhibitor ethoxzolamide (EZ), drawing a comparison to a range of liverworts and mosses. 
The  results showed that inhibition of assimilation occurred in all  bryophyte treated with EZ, however the degree of inhibition was greatest  in Phaeoceros laevis.  Furthermore, there was a pronounced decline in Ci-uptake efficiency and  a decrease in the initial slope of CO2-affinity curve at low external  levels where Ci-uptake efficiency in other liverworts were unaffected.  There were no significant differences between the convexities of the  light response curves in Phaeoceros which would indicate a diversion of ATP to energise the CCM. 
In studies on light dark transients on Phaeoceros treated with EZ a speculation made was that although active transport of CO2  was still occurring (due to the appearance of a CO2 release pool), the  Ci transported to the stroma is not being utilized by Rubisco when CA is  suppressed by EZ. This point may raise the question as what the exact  mechanism of Ci transport is if EZ does not suppress the active uptake  of CO2 in the Anthocerotae. 
The major drawback with using EZ to manipulate the operation of the Anthocerotae  CCM in future studies is that CA is involved in other non CCM  photosynthetic processes, as shown by the depressions of gross  assimilation rates in mosses of 65 % and 50% in other non CCM based  liverworts treated with EZ. 
The usefulness of being able to "switch of " or down regulate the Phaeoceros CCM  with a high CO2  environment will be critical in elucidating the operation of the Anthocerotae CCM.   However in terms of the ecology of Phaeoceros, a relatively rapid response (of approx. 14 days) to variations in external CO2  (initially  5% CO2) may not be seen, due to the fact that fluctuations  in CO2 in the aerial environment is relatively minimal, or at least not  as irritate as in a water column.
